Ultimately all of our views on a variety of life topics are directly affected and shaped by a foundational view. As a Bible Christian, mine are governed by what I have discovered in the Bible through study. These studies have been enlightening and faith building for me and have helped me to "see" the truth in many Bible topics and life issues. I pray that it will be a blessing to you, as it has been for me.
A “Prophesyingly” Interpretive Commentary (Ezek 37:1-14 (NASB))
The Vision
Ezekiel 37:1 - The hand of the LORD was upon me, and He brought me out by the Spirit of the LORD and set me down in the middle of the valley; and it was full of bones.
-hand of the Lord upon & brought out by the Spirit - Ezekiel was made to see this representation through a vision only and not in reality. As such it was God showing him what was the case/condition with Israel. As Israel, in mainly the surviving tribe of Judah then, which had actually been judged (Ezek 9) some ca. 7 years before[1] (See also in the outline chart of Ezekiel here). This vision is therefore a representation of what is, however, to the extent that it is shown (i.e, many, dry, bones strewn across a valley), which was not a depiction of actual reality with the people of Judah or Israel, it is really a representation of how God was seeing things.
-the valley - It is also significant that God has brought Ezekiel to “the valley”. First of all, with the use of a definite article in referring to the “valley” in this vision, it implies that Ezekiel knew exactly in which “valley” he had been brought, it was evidently the same ‘known valley’ that God had instructed him to go to, so that He could “speak” to him there, back in Ezek 3:22, 23 (cf. Ezek 8:4). Indeed the valley was a common place for such official decisive meetings, particularly ones that could potentially evolve into open armed conflict resolutions (cf. Neh 6:2, (Neh 6:3)). And as the valley was a terrain without any natural obstacles (cf. Isa 40:4); nor hampering marsh-type patches of water (cf. Isa 41:18), it was indeed the perfect place to have two (large) warring armies, and all of their warring “(mobile) implements” [of that time] (e.g., horses and horse-drawn chariots), meet (2 Chr 35:22; cf. Zech 12:11 [2]). However in that first valley meeting with Ezekiel, God, being on the side of Ezekiel, had there re-created the foundational vision of Ezekiel’s ministry of him seeing, thus grasping/understanding, the ‘Glory (= Character) of God.’ (Ezek 3:23 = Ezek 1:1ff). And indeed in that valley meeting, God there first gave Ezekiel “warring” instructions as to the actions that must now be taken against rebellious Israel (Ezek 3:24-27ff). Ezekiel 37:2 - He caused me to pass among them round about, and behold, there were very many on the surface of the valley; and lo, they were very dry.
-on the surface of the valley - The way these bones are shown to be strewn about on the surface of a valley (or “plain”), this is the depiction of an army that had been assembled there for battle. In fact, there may be a prophetic/thematic significance with the fact that an ultimate battle is mentioned in the next two chapters, i.e., the one against ‘Gog from Magog’ (Ezek 38 & 39; cf. Rev 20:8). So God’s People then may have gathered there to counter that looming threat. However, as depicted in the present vision, God first had a “Spiritual Reviving” (leading to the Latter Rain) and “Battalions Reforming” (cf. GC 425.1-2; PK 725.1/2; EW 52.1) work to do amongst them (=LDE 189.3). However, and towards this Final Conflict end, as spoken in the vision that immediately follows this one, in Ezek 37:15-28, God first needed to do a full Restoration of His Israel (=Rev 7).
-same, prior vision, valley - Interestingly enough, as already introduced above at the Ezek 37:1 commentary, God had brought Ezekiel to this manifestly same valley back in Ezek 3:22, 23, where this present war would take place. Therefore God had brought him there, and that to give him warring instructions against Israel, (that indeed if not heeded would result in this present state of utter defeat), long before any hint of a major war had become evident. (Amos 3:7). Also/Thus, by sequitur implication, seeing/understanding the Glory of God (Ezek 1:1ff), as Ezekiel did in that valley, pivotally had much to do with that coming major war. (COL 69:1-2; 414.1-416.1 -discussed here&depicted here; cf. Rev 14:7).
-[bones] were very dry - The fact that there bones are very dry indicates that they had been lying there dead for many years by then.
Ezekiel 37:3 - He said to me, "Son of man, can these bones live?" And I answered, "O Lord GOD, You know."
-"O Lord GOD You Know" - The answer of Ezekiel here is echoed in Revelation 7:13, 14 where one of the 24 elders actually “answered” manifestly a question that John had on his mind while gazing at the Great Multitude that resulted from the sealing of Israel (vss. Rev 7:4-12). John was evidently surprised by this turnout and the Elder pointed out exactly how these had come to “triumphed” (vss. Rev 7:14b ff).
-=John's Throne Room Experience - Interestingly enough, the last time that John had encountered one of those elders in his revelation was in the Throne Room scene back in Rev 4 & 5
Ezekiel 37:4 - Again He said to me, "Prophesy over these bones and say to them, 'O dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.'
-...and say to them - The fact that Ezekiel is here instructed to speak to these dry bones, and that they could “hear”, shows that this was indeed a representation of the spiritual state of God’s people.
Ezekiel 37:5 - "Thus says the Lord GOD to these bones, 'Behold, I will cause breath to enter you that you may come to life.
-cause breath to enter - “Breath” is indeed understood as a “spirit”; here the Spirit of God. This does come to bring life.
Ezekiel 37:6 - 'I will put sinews on you, make flesh grow back on you, cover you with skin and put breath in you that you may come alive; and you will know that I am the LORD.'"
-will put...make...cover....put....may come... - It is striking to see that God will actually, forcefully do this and it is actually only after that it is done, that God’s People will recognize/acknowledge that ‘He is the LORD.’
Ezekiel 37:7 - So I was made to prophesy as I was commanded; and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold, a rattling; and the bones came together, bone to its bone.
-I was made to prophesy as I was commanded - This indeed is the accurate rendering of the passive Niphal verbal form used here in the underlying Hebrew text. So Ezekiel here is just following orders. And, no doubt to his surprise, as he was prophesying, the bones gradually started to come to together.
-and behold, a rattling - The term “rattling” is actually more forceful as it speaks of a “Shaking” (Amos 1:1; Zech 14:5 - LXX/Greek “seismos”) So even when it is speaking of a “tumult” or “commotion” it is actually speaking of ‘an earth shaking one’....It just is not actually the “harvest sifting” Shaking (=Rev 11:13b), but a quasi-make shift one which preludes and prepares it (=Rev 11:13a).
::Application: This (seismic) “Shaking” is thematically linked to the one spoken of here from Rev 11:13a. (= ‘the (distinct) shaking of the powers of the (powers that rule on the) Earth’ (=EW 41.1-2. See the Historical "shaking" of world ruling powers: here. For the future, Eschatological, worldwide realization cf. this pointed post -depicted in Episodes #1-#22here); [-Episodes #23-#59there depict the (distinct), (‘religiously-related’), ‘powers that rule in the heavens (=“in religious realms”)’ which are “then”/next shaken (=Heb 12:26), symbolized by the Sun (=righteousness/(socio-)economy), Moon (=religious economy), and Stars (=religious/righteousness leaders)] =Isa 24:16-23|Heb 12:25-29). See much more on the results of this development inthis post.
Ezekiel 37:8 - And I looked, and behold, sinews were on them, and flesh grew and skin covered them; but there was no breath in them.
-...but...no breath in them - As in the sequence of things planned/prophesied back in Ezek 37:6, though these bones had been reassembled and being refitted with sinews, flesh and skin, they were still lifeless as they still were missing the breath/spirit of God. They were thus really not alive yet. As seen in the next verse, these now “enfleshed” bodies as still “slain” (i.e., dead). The revival process had begun but was not complete until they came to have this Spirit of God.
-=NT's: "birth from above" - (This spiritual theme is very allusive to the New Birth process mentioned by Christ in John 3:1-9ff, where it is the breath of God that is really the key to the New Birth and not mere physicality.)
Ezekiel 37:9 - Then He said to me, "Prophesy to the breath, prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath, 'Thus says the Lord GOD, "Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe on these slain, that they come to life."'"(=Rev 11:11, 12)
-prophesy..., prophesy - Ezekiel is now here insistently ordered to prophesy to the breath itself. He was to say to this breath to come from the Four Winds.
-=Rev 7's "Four Winds" - With this vision being thematically closely tied to the effect of the Sealing in the Great Multitude of Rev 7, the mention of the Four Winds here is allusive to the Four Winds mentioned in Rev 7:1-3 which had been held back, at the command of a Mighty Angel (see 20MR 216.6-217.1),[3] so that the Sealing of the 144,000 could take place, starting with Judah. This vision is a smaller scale of the Rev 7 Great Multitude, focusing on the tribe of Judah only, which as it will be shown, is the “House of Israel.” (See more on this ‘Four Winds’ event/development in this post.)
Ezekiel 37:10 - So I made myself to prophesy as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they came to life and stood on their feet, an exceedingly great army.(=Rev 11:11, 12)
-made myself to prophesy - Herethe verb “prophesied” is in the reflexive intensive for, (the Hithpeel form) and literally shows that Ezekiel, no doubt at the related urgency of God in Ezek 37:9, ‘made himself to prophesy’. The breath indeed did come into them and they indeed came to life and, interestingly enough, became an army. This shows/confirms that, as depicted in Ezek 37:2, this had indeed been an army gathered in plain for a battle. The fact that they are assembled as an army after their revival shows that this battle had yet to occur. Yet somehow, they had been strewn there as if already soundly defeated by an opposing army. That has only been seen in Israel’s history when an army suddenly turned on themselves and completely killed themselves off (2 Chr 20:22-24), or by direct action of God (Isa 37:36/2Kgs 19:35; (2 Chr 13:12-19); 2 Chr 32:20-22; cf. Isa 31:4b-5, 8). So by implication this can come to be if this army was similarly guilty of having defeated themselves by such “in-fighting” or if God had acted against them. The prior choice contextually seems to be the case here and can figuratively be fulfilled today through especially trying to do the work of the Church Militant through competitive means, as economically seen in Capitalism and its pervasive systemic reach, when adopted and allowed to do so. (=Zech 13:5b, 6 -see here)
::Application: This notion of a ‘resulting, exceedingly great army’ is, as discussed in here (see at Rev 19:14), the, indeed Two Witnesses-initiated one finally “winds-materialized” and organized during the prophetic Sixth Era’s Trumpet (Rev 9:12- =Rev 7:4-8ff), and is synonymous with the post-whirlwind judgement of God shown to EGW. See this post.
God Explains the Vision
Ezekiel 37:11 - Then He said to me, "Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel; behold, they say, 'Our bones are dried up and our hope has perished. We are completely cut off.'
-the "House of Israel" - There is a difference between saying simply “Israel” and “the house of Israel”. The expression “house” of refers to an inner core of that great entity. It is like a nucleus from which the greater entity can be reformed. It also represents the portion of that greater entity that is vital to its survival. As seen in Ezek 9:9 & 37:16, the “House of Israel” and “Judah” are not one and the same thing however the House of Israel was contained within the surviving tribe of Judah and is conflatedly addressed as such throughout the book of Ezekiel (ca. 83X - e.g., Ezek 3:1, 4, 5, 7; 8:6, etc). Judah had the added burden and responsibility of bringing about the reestablishment of the other 10+ tribes of Israel. So they indeed also contained that “house” in their midst and this was indeed their paramount reason of existence and why God had worked to preserve them as a Remnant of His former whole nation. That is also why Judah is shown to be the first tribe sealed in the (related) 144,000 Sealing prophecy of (Rev 7:4).
-behold they say:... - With this explanation actually reverting back to the time when the bones were lifeless, God is stating how these symbolic bones of the House of Israel (within Judah) had felt. They felt that they were beyond any chance of being revived and that apparently because they were “hopeless”. They felt that they had been “separated”. This supposed “separation” is actually not the covenant related “cutting off” reserved for those who God had rejected and condemned to death. It was just as mere separation. So the sense of these dry bones, also supposing a perishing of their hope/expectation/longing, was actually an overstatement of actual events. They were not as “beyond usefulness” as they thought.
Ezekiel 37:12 - "Therefore prophesy and say to them, 'Thus says the Lord GOD, "Behold, I will open your graves and cause you to come up out of your graves, My people; and I will bring you into the land of Israel.
-fallen in individual graves, not on (battle) field - Now the scene shifts to normative graves vs. an open-field strewning. This is thus a further detailing of what the real state of these slain ones had been. They had not even gathered in the valley/plain as an army for a battle and been slain by an opposing force, but had simply, individually, naturally died and been normatively buried.
-...bring you into the land of Israel(!) - The endgoal theme of the prior vision is also refocused here to show that it is the restoration to the land of Israel (from both Babylon and other places in the world, which also was in the realm of the then ruling Babylonian Empire).
Ezekiel 37:13 - "Then you will know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves and caused you to come up out of your graves, My people.
-Then you will know... - Again, it is actually after that this revival/resuscitation is completed that these people would fully understand and acknowledge their God.
Ezekiel 37:14 - "I will put My Spirit within you and you will come to life, and I will place you on your own land. Then you will know that I, the LORD, have spoken and done it," declares the LORD.'"
-sequence of 'reviving' - As stipulated in this verse, the sequence of things will be that God will first put His Spirit in them, reviving them (their already reformed and enfleshed body) back to life and then place them back into their own land. Then will these people understand what has taken place here. -reorganization, then reviving.... - And the sequencing is key here: prior to being filled with God’s Spirit, they have to be bodily “re-organized”, culminating in the putting of flesh on their rejoined bones and inner organ or else they are (indeed) no better than what the (Eschatological) BabylonianMark of the Beast Camp will become after God has ‘“strongly” (Rev 18:8ff), warringly, judged it’ (Rev 19:17-21 -see here). Once that ‘bodily re-organization’ (LDE 189.3b) has been completed then God can fill that “body” with the full measure of His (Latter Rain) Spirit. (=LDE 189.1-196.1).
Current Day's Application[4]
For now 17+ years, since the release of this initial, eschatological, message on Revelation 11 back in June 2000, the “Testimony to the Church” has been, and continues to be, based on the Bible, SOP and actual, fulfilling developments, that: ‘because of the unacceptable state and works of the Church, time will again, as with the first generation of SDA, and Ancient Israel, both, respectively, spiritually and literally, on the borders of the Promise Land, be prolonged. However God’s still planned Great Work would continue to advance.’ So, as detailed here, an eschatological age of prophetic fulfillment would come to pass. Most SDA have rejected this message, mainly because they saw nothing wrong with the way they were as a God’s professed People, nor in how they were conducted God’s work, which was, and still is, mainly through spurious capitalistic methods. As such God’s work has been artificially limited by the ‘commands of men’; and fallen/evil men at that. SDA’s have also rejected this Biblical Message because accepting it would mean that the long proclaimed and adhered to “Hope/Expectation/Longing” of the Second Coming, pointedly in their lifetime, would, according to their understanding, surely not occur in their lifetime. So they saw it best to reject that call for practical Sabbatical Works, and continue to “profess” that ‘they believe in the soon Return of Christ.’ What they Theologically do not understand is that mere profession of the Second Coming won’t make it happen. By their works, or actually lack thereof, in the Light of what they should be for this most blessed and, variously, rich Church, they are the ones who are postponing the Glorious Return of Christ, and refusing to fulfill Christ’s Gospel Mandate only is compoundedly making this much worse, and that also to their own peril. So, as Jesus said, by so ‘wishing to save their lives’ they are actually losing it, but those who lose it for the Gospel’s sake will save it. (Mark 8:35). However the “moronically” expedient thing for them to do was to ignore the Gospel mandate claims of Christ’s Gospel.
So here these SDA Believers are depicted in this vision to Ezekiel (misunderstandingly) claiming/believing that their “Hope” was lost in the light of their evident slain, dried up bones conditions as depicted by God in vision to Ezekiel. They also felt doomed, decreed to death, even “cut off”. However that does not have to necessarily be the case. God’s prolonged work which had started when the Jesus-Commissioned Mighty Angel had command Four other Mighty Angels to hold the Four Winds (see in this post), was not necessarily an utter end for them. Though the Second Coming could, and probably would be prolonged, due to their own faults and thus actually for their salvific benefit, they still could have a great part to do in this Greater Work of God. Also, like the SDA Church’s belief that they currently are marshaling towards the prophesied Final Conflict, indeed the Battle of Har-Mageddon, and actually see themselves as already in that battlefield, ready and even present long before their enemies know to come to that prophetic battle field and fight them. (As seen in many popular claims of ‘fulfilling Sunday Law events’ or other conspiracies supposedly aimed at SDA’s, which those who are accused of doing such acts actually are not even doing so, especially not knowingly. -Actual acts against, pointedly, SDA’s, which will fulfill Final Events will all be knowing and deliberate ones.) So as God goes on to show in Ezek 37:13, 14, these deluded dry bones had actually just been lying dead in their own graves and not from even, honorably despite defeat, in a (spiritual) battlefield conflict. So, all this time, they had not been ‘fighting the good fight of faith’. (1 Tim 6:12).
From Ezekiel`s first wave of prophesying, these dry bones are physically restored, yet they are still lifeless, lacking God`s Spirit. That ‘life giving breath’ is to come from the Four Winds which all shows that it is only when the Church realizes|understands|acknowledges what has taken place in these times with the holding back of the Four Winds (= a halting of Final Events) due to their own individual (graves) and collective (valley) unworthiness and unfitness for God’s Final Conflict, all given birth to the Eschatological wave of Bible Prophecy, will it then ‘come to life’, even a New Birth Life, doing the actual works of Christ, fulfilling His Gospel Commission. In doing this work, this Church Triumphant Work, as it inevitably due, the Church will then have restored God’s Israel. It is probably only after this comes to pass that it will truly understand all that has taken place here and that this is indeed God’s Will and His Doing. (RH, January 17, 1893 par. 7-10)...
...And as detailed in the “eyes like a flaming fire” section in here, this Ezekiel 37 “resurrection through God’s “Son of Man” (e.g., Ezek 37:9, 11) prophesying” was symbolically shown in vision to EGW, in her first “vision”, in EW 15.2-16.1's (a) “silver trumpet” (=typological/second-best) resurrection through the “Son of Man” (=Rev 14:14-16's Church, indeed "Shaking", “Harvesting” (Matt 13:36-43|COL 62-69|70-75), by (b) in actually, ‘paramountly/solely regards and acts (=“eyes and hands” (=Dan 12:6-7|Rev 10:5-7)) towards/for heaven’ (=Exod 32:11-14), (c) then having “wrapped himself” in those: “unworthy (=Rev 6:16-17|DA 825.4)-professed-people-“through and through”-searching, “flame of fire” “Theological Views””!!
Notes
[1] Through the dated and chronological way in which the book of Ezekiel was written, with visions given over ca. 20 years, the prophesied events in Ezekiel 8-11 (ca. 593-2 B.C. (Ezek 1:1, 2; 8:1) vs. ca. 585 B.C for Ezek 33ff (Ezek 32:1; 33:21)) manifestly did come to pass on Judah in the ca, 588-586 B.C. siege and destruction by Babylon (see e.g., Jer 34:1ff; 39:1ff; 52:4ff). This was a third and the most destructive siege on Judah by Babylon in which Jerusalem and the Temple were captured and physically destroyed (see Jer 39:8) vs. the limited, mere “pillaging” damage in the prior sieges and assaults.
[2] It is rightly understood that the mention of, accurately, “Har-Megiddo” (a.k.a. Armageddon) in Rev 16:16 involves a major conflict, and this relatable allusion in Zech 12:11 (=2 Chr 35:20-25) can cast much light on that obscure eschatological mention/application. First of all, unlike what is normative for a major war involving large and “sophisticated” armies, the eschatological war does not take place in a “valley”, but involves a “mountain”. Secondly, the context of Zech 12, which dovetails into the Divine Judgement of Chapter 13, doubly involves: ‘God warring against those who have assembled against Jerusalem’, but also ‘against those in Jerusalem who are bringing/holding His people down’, namely the defective/deficient leaders. The prime symbolism of this is seen in the fact that in that epic and memorable battle of 2 Chr 35, ultra good king Josiah had lost his life because he had refused to obey what was actually God’s will and word. (2 Chr 35:20-22ff). So God’s main concern in this war, on top of also bringing utter defeat to enemies of His Israel, was/(still) is to (a) preserve the house of David, and (b) spare all those who are faithful in Jerusalem. In fact it is those “spared ones” who go on to, almost supernaturally, inflict defeat upon Israel’s enemies (see Zech 12:8, 9; = Rev 11:13). So the key here is to grasp what is meant by the opposite symbol of a “mountain” in Rev 16:16 vs. the expected/normative “valley”. (See in this post for the explanation of that symbol. See this dedicated post, and in this post at its Rev 16:16 comments section, for the latest, and more, on Har-Mageddon.).
[3]In thematically prophetic relation to this post on the Two Witnesses, non-accidently with one of them being representative of the Elijah work and his due, circumstancelymade necessary, complimentary Eschatological work (cf. here on Mal 4:4-6), it is commonly assumed that it was God who told Elijah to tell Ahab that because of Israel’s waywardness in worship Baal, rain was going to be withheld, and that for precisely a symbolically significant 3.5 years, however the Biblical testimony (James 5:17; 1 Kgs 17:1ff, which is actually not contradicted by the Spirit of Prophecy (SOP) (PK 119.1-121.2ff), both, i.e., combinedly, make it clear that it was Elijah himself who initiated and/or, being Spiritually in tune (cf. Matt 18:18), indeed came in tune with the already decreed, and to be carried out, “turn of events” here. In other words, Elijah, seeing Israel’s waywardness, knew that the God of Heaven will surely not leave this unpunished, nor reward it, and thus earnestly prayed that God fittingly punish Israel, and that pointedly in the exact way of their waywardness, which was the thinking that their man-made/ascribed to (foreign) god was responsible for their livelihood and more powerful, “at least in that regard”, than the even professed “Creator” God of Heaven. Then, as it can be seen in the SOP account, God would have responded to Elijah that it would indeed be just as he had requested and no rain would indeed not be sent and he could go ahead and announce this to King Ahab. That would also explain why Elijah was doubtful about his commission as he was traveling by fertile lands (PK 121.2). If it was God who had initially told him this, then he likely would not be second guessing God as he knew God would do this. But because it was him who had initiated that request, perhaps he felt here that he may have asked for too much. However he went ahead in faith because the God of Heaven had indeed ratified his punishment proposal. Indeed we find the same themes in the “EschatologicalHolding back of the Four Winds’ which were to cause Bible/SOP Final Events to unravel. And that punishment came to take 3.5 years before it was deemed complete, and that ended again at ‘Elijah’s relating word’, whenever it would be that God would signal him to do so (1 Kgs 17:1b & 18:1). (So any prophetic use of this 3.5 years period is intended to be allusive to this Elijah judgement and not, as popularly commonly assumed, “half of a perfect/complete7 years.”
[4] See the common, and latest, exegetically glib/surface SDA understanding of this prophecy in this, late December 2010, sermon by Derek Morris for a GC Revival and Reformation Week series. See also this similarly, exegetically glib recent (ca. March 19, 2011) sermon ([video] [audio]) by Doug Batchelor on this prophecy. As both, stemming from various inculcated, capitalistic/individualistic, artificial limitations, fail to recognize the real and depth of, practical and sectarian pivotal problems of the Church, they both fail to properly interpret and apply this prophecy, settling for surface, spiritually vacuous/teethless and “wall plastering”, understandings. (=Ezek 13:10-16) On the other hand, see the February 2-5, 2012 ‘Revival and Latter Rain’ series preached by Mark Howard on the Andrews University Campus, -priorly preached in May 2011 at Loma Linda: Part 1 - Why Revival Waits, Part 2 - Revival of True Discipleship and Part 3 - Preparing for Rain; which is the best exposition and exhortation on this issue which I have heard from amongst SDA, pointedly because it is not ‘glossingly and indifferently, “watering-downly” apologetic’ as other SDA attempts (typically) have been.
Thanks John...The SDA Church has instead insisted on pursuing its, at best, spurious revival efforts. They like learning ‘the hard way’ (=Amos 7:7-9) instead of, straightly/fully, God’s Way.
August 15, 2013 02:54 PM Thank you. While reading your commentary, I thought you might be a SDA, it is so well done. I'm glad to see I was right. I love our church, it is such a pleasure to be Bible based and not subject to the traditions of men. Well done! GH
Hello GH, Thank You for the comment. I am glad you appreciated the Ezek 37 commentary.
To be full-disclosurely accurate, as I state and reference in my blog’s “Profile” section, I am indeed of SDA Background (born and raised in the SDA Church), but since then, (ca. 1999 to be precise), because the SDA Church has, as cited here and here, persistingly refused to practice what they preach, I have gradually no longer considered myself to (at least technically) but now instead consider myself to be “Beyond SDA”. As revealed in the Bible and SOP, there is some much more that God wants to reveal and have His People and Remnant Cause do towards fulfilling the Full Gospel/Sabbatical will of Christ and God (=Matt 25:31-46; DA 637.1) [See here and in this dedicated blog post than what SDA are, most dangerously (DA 825.4 = Rev 14:9-11), artificially and spuriously limiting Him and themselves to. This entire “Theological Views” blog is dedicated to searching out the Bible and SOP to bring out that Greater Light.
Hi [NJK], understand your position. I notice a lot of apostacy in the church, but isn't it prophetic? To me the church is a perfect representation of Laodecia. I am a big admirer of Dr Veith, and he is always admonishing us to 'buy glue'. It is difficult sometimes, but I love Sister White, and she did mention despite the problems to stick with the system. I do have several friends who are struggling with this same issue. I hope the 'shaking' comes, the latter rain, and the conclusion of sin, and we can go home. God Bless you! G
Hi G, (Just noticed your response email). Dr. Veith’s presentation are always insightful and interesting. Glad to hear that you also appreciate Ellen White. She has taken quite a lot of unfair criticism by people who do not understand the interdependent interplay of the human and the Divine for the gift of Prophecy. (I have a blog post dedicated to Biblically proving her to have been right on key issues, and the very helpful seminars/sermons/books of others are include there as well.
Thank you for the advice about the ‘sticking with the SDA Church’. I came to my decision, (which was to allow my Home Church membership to be dropped upon me leaving Andrews University and (back) moving to Canada), upon much pondering. It increasingly became evident that things would just not get done as God expects them by the indifference and limitations in the SDA Church. So I set out to establish a new organization. I was later most glad to see that EGW actually deliberately left open this possibility of a “new denomination” ‘if/when there would be an actual/tangible need to do so.’ (See the whole context of 1SM 176-185, cf. LDE 59-61, all discussed here). And there is indeed this need with the current SDA Church indifferent impasse in regards to True Gospel work.
It is by faith-based actions to fully seek to still do Christ’s full will despite this apostasy that the righteous in the Church will survive this, actually currently going on/wrapping up Shaking.
Relatedly, you may find the following related blog post helpful on this key/pivotal issue:
Thank you [NJK] for all your research data. I will look at your references. I agree with you completely that EGW was inspired by God in her writing. Understanding her history, and coupling it with her body of work, indicates a miracle occurred. When actually reading it, to me, the miracle is confirmed. She does write about the ship, the ice berg, and passengers shaken. I'm sure you know about that vision. Indicates, the church. I am just concerned about "leaning unto my own understanding..." I know the church has a lot of things wrong, but Satan works feverishly here, so no wonder. I can not call it Babylon, even though many Babylonians in it. I am enjoying your information, you have an insightful mind. Your Sister in Christ, G.
August 16, 2013 01:19 PM On The State, Standing and Fate of the Church
You are welcome G. The proof of EGW’s connection to Christ/God is indeed in the substance of her writings. It is interesting that a 2005 US-wide survey revealed that many (under 40) pastors across all denominations cited her as one of their most influential authors. As presenter Mark Howard relates in one of his SOP seminars,[1] even an independent non-SDA Lawyer who was hired in the 1980's to look into the common charge against her of plagiarism, not only most objectively and factually cleared her of that charge, but also gave a quite poignant testimony of how the copious reading he had done of her writings for that legal task had actually Spiritually “moved” him!!
[1] I can’t relocate the exact one and its audio/video link from the listing provided in here
I know there is much to go through and read on my blog, so perhaps these specific links to topics which are most pertinent to the related raised issue(s) here could be of previewing convenience (and also time-saving wise) for you.
To give you a little bit of pertinent contextualization background to my blog work/writing: The foundation of my ministering life since 1997 has always involved trying to figure out why there was such difference with what SDA teach and believe and also the great promises made to them, and the various non-realizations in their experience and existence, and my deeper research has always found the many places where what we believe, teach and practice are more “traditional” than concrete and transparent truth. I first encountered this pivotal reality in trying to figure out why not all Christians believed our presentation on Daniel’s 70 Week ‘since it was so exact, incontrovertible and clear’ well upon undertaking that research,[1] I quickly saw that behind the facade of our presentation, though my research resulted in showing that our dates were correct, the reasons and proofs of fulfilling events and dates that we were giving we actually full of errors and inaccuracies which most non-SDA’s were aware of...hence their rejection of that key/foundational prophecy. I since have found this to be the case with most of what we thought. {Cf. e.g., here}. I.e., they all needed to be better proven. As EGW said, we were to “improve” the light of our fathers putting what they Biblically discovered on the most possible sure and solid foundation. (1T 262.1) What was “surfacly” acceptable in the days of EGW is no longer so in our more Biblical Scholarship advanced days. That I why focus in exegetically proving how the various “extra-Biblical” that EGW had were actually always exegetically supported in the Bible.
[1] See the “Biblical Interpretation” (starting from the summary): here}
[Note: The following section was subsequently expanded and reposted in this post at Note #12 Now, to this important issue about the 1904 Ship/Vessel-Iceberg-“Shaken” vision of EGW. It is recorded in 1SM 205.2-206.3 & SpTB02 55.1-56.3. It is found in the context of a “new movement” trying to be formed by “sophistries” being introduced in the SDA Church then, mainly in regards to John Harvey Kellogg’s teaching that there was no Heavenly Sanctuary and his pantheistic theories. And in that vision, EGW was told to meet those heresies (iceberg) head on. As she also said back in 1897, the Shaking would also come through the introduction of such false theories/teachings in the Church (LDE 177.1). So here she was instructed to not let this occur, but to “Meet it” and so defeat it. The same thing should have been going on in the SDA Church today with now, the many false practices which have been allowed to enter the Church. Again the Church’s teachings are “fundamentally” Biblical, but the Church has many widely accepted practices which certainly are not, and are literally self-hindering the advancement of this Ship. Unlike in EGW’s day where there evidently were many others who sided with Truth against the false theories then, today most of the Church leadership and members either fully endorse those false practices or they are just indifferent to them. That “non-meeting inaction” actually is conversely what results in the Church corporately not being able to survive this Shaking (=5T 210.3-211.2ff) for, like in EGW vision, it would have require strong, fact, powerful and collective/corporate countering action to get through it.
So, from my Bible and SOP studies into this issue, the SDA Vessel here/now is actually quite critically damage and is fatally taking on water. The “Church Militant”, i.e., even the faithful “7000" ones (Rev 11:13) who had taken the battle field has defeated itself as the start of the Ezek 37 actually was depicting. They can however join the ‘distinct’ Church Triumphant(LDE 61-62) , if they actually allow God, and in His way, to both Revive and Reform them.
The SDA Church is indeed not Babylon, and that pointedly is because unlike Babylon, it is not “confused”. It clearly knows what God’s Full Truth is. So it instead is God’s Jerusalem and History has shown that God will not abstain from, even most severely, judging His Jerusalem if it deserves it. (E.g., Jer 6-7; Luke 19:41-44), and even rejected and replaced (e.g., Rev 3:16; LDE 59-61ff; cf. Rev 2:5). As I document in this post EGW herself knew that the SDA Church could become a “sister to fallen Babylon” and even, through socio-economic injustices, like Sodom and Gomorrah (Ezek 16:48-50; Isa 1:8-20) for that is what the present, Eschatological phase of Revelation Babylon (Protestant-controlled America) is also doing.
Final point: There is a very important Spiritual/Theological point to keep in mind from what God stipulated in Jer 18:1-10. As EGW similarly said ‘all of God’s promises are upon condition of obedience’ (COL 145.1) So whatever God has promised to the SDA Church is not set in stone, indeed, relatedly, the future itself is not set in stone. So God can, and my view and experience is that He has long begun to, replace the ‘indifferently, unzealously non-repentful’ (contra. Rev 3:18) SDA Church, and had long given warnings through the SOP that this could become the actually transpired reality case. (LDE 59-61). That is relatedly why the Second Coming was at least 3 times postponed in the days of EGW...because, as with rebellious Ancient Israel (cf. 15MR 292.3-4) the “conditions of the ground” did not warrant the fulfillment the many, and quite specific promises made to that generation. The same Divine conditional principle still applies today. (Jer 18:9-10)
Sorry for the length of this email. It is just that this pivotal is quite involved and I would not to it justice by not summarily presenting it in as much of its substantiating/validating details as possible. Of course, do see my blog post for much more.
May God guide your studies, Likewise, your Brother in Christ, [NJK]
This blog aims to be factual and, at the very least, implicitly documented. Therefore if applicable, any comment which contains unsubstantiated/unsupportable ideas will not be allowed to be published on this blog. Therefore make the effort to be Biblical, truthful and factual.
-It typically takes 1-2 days for an accepted submitted comment to be posted and/or responded to.
[If you leave an "anonymous" comment and, if applicable, would like to know why it may not have been published, resend the comment via email (see profile) to receive the response.]
Good informative and Church of God needs to heed into
ReplyDeleteThanks John...The SDA Church has instead insisted on pursuing its, at best, spurious revival efforts. They like learning ‘the hard way’ (=Amos 7:7-9) instead of, straightly/fully, God’s Way.
DeleteGod Bless!
Revive us oh Lord to rise up an army
ReplyDeleteYou can see the pivotal understanding which will produce this “army with many banners” (PK 725.1) in this post
Delete[From an Emailed Comment]:
ReplyDeleteAugust 15, 2013 02:54 PM
Thank you. While reading your commentary, I thought you might be a SDA, it is so well done. I'm glad to see I was right. I love our church, it is such a pleasure to be Bible based and not subject to the traditions of men. Well done! GH
August 15, 2013 08:54 PM
DeleteHello GH, Thank You for the comment. I am glad you appreciated the Ezek 37 commentary.
To be full-disclosurely accurate, as I state and reference in my blog’s “Profile” section, I am indeed of SDA Background (born and raised in the SDA Church), but since then, (ca. 1999 to be precise), because the SDA Church has, as cited here and here, persistingly refused to practice what they preach, I have gradually no longer considered myself to (at least technically) but now instead consider myself to be “Beyond SDA”. As revealed in the Bible and SOP, there is some much more that God wants to reveal and have His People and Remnant Cause do towards fulfilling the Full Gospel/Sabbatical will of Christ and God (=Matt 25:31-46; DA 637.1) [See here and in this dedicated blog post than what SDA are, most dangerously (DA 825.4 = Rev 14:9-11), artificially and spuriously limiting Him and themselves to. This entire “Theological Views” blog is dedicated to searching out the Bible and SOP to bring out that Greater Light.
Hi [NJK], understand your position. I notice a lot of apostacy in the church, but isn't it prophetic? To me the church is a perfect representation of Laodecia. I am a big admirer of Dr Veith, and he is always admonishing us to 'buy glue'. It is difficult sometimes, but I love Sister White, and she did mention despite the problems to stick with the system. I do have several friends who are struggling with this same issue. I hope the 'shaking' comes, the latter rain, and the conclusion of sin, and we can go home. God Bless you! G
DeleteAugust 16, 2013 12:12 AM
DeleteHi G, (Just noticed your response email). Dr. Veith’s presentation are always insightful and interesting. Glad to hear that you also appreciate Ellen White. She has taken quite a lot of unfair criticism by people who do not understand the interdependent interplay of the human and the Divine for the gift of Prophecy. (I have a blog post dedicated to Biblically proving her to have been right on key issues, and the very helpful seminars/sermons/books of others are include there as well.
Thank you for the advice about the ‘sticking with the SDA Church’. I came to my decision, (which was to allow my Home Church membership to be dropped upon me leaving Andrews University and (back) moving to Canada), upon much pondering. It increasingly became evident that things would just not get done as God expects them by the indifference and limitations in the SDA Church. So I set out to establish a new organization. I was later most glad to see that EGW actually deliberately left open this possibility of a “new denomination” ‘if/when there would be an actual/tangible need to do so.’ (See the whole context of 1SM 176-185, cf. LDE 59-61, all discussed here). And there is indeed this need with the current SDA Church indifferent impasse in regards to True Gospel work.
It is by faith-based actions to fully seek to still do Christ’s full will despite this apostasy that the righteous in the Church will survive this, actually currently going on/wrapping up Shaking.
Relatedly, you may find the following related blog post helpful on this key/pivotal issue:
The Latter Rain - http://njkproject.blogspot.com/2010/01/real-outpouring-of-holy-spirit.html
Ezekiel 8 - http://njkproject.blogspot.com/2009/11/sealing-of-gods-people.html
Ezekiel 9 - http://njkproject.blogspot.com/2009/11/sealing-of-gods-people-part-2-ezekiel-9.html
Christ’s (Full) Righteousness - http://njkproject.blogspot.com/2011/10/1888-message-for-today.html
amongst others.
August 16, 2013 08:37 AM
DeleteThank you [NJK] for all your research data. I will look at your references. I agree with you completely that EGW was inspired by God in her writing. Understanding her history, and coupling it with her body of work, indicates a miracle occurred. When actually reading it, to me, the miracle is confirmed. She does write about the ship, the ice berg, and passengers shaken. I'm sure you know about that vision. Indicates, the church. I am just concerned about "leaning unto my own understanding..." I know the church has a lot of things wrong, but Satan works feverishly here, so no wonder. I can not call it Babylon, even though many Babylonians in it. I am enjoying your information, you have an insightful mind. Your Sister in Christ, G.
August 16, 2013 01:19 PM
DeleteOn The State, Standing and Fate of the Church
You are welcome G. The proof of EGW’s connection to Christ/God is indeed in the substance of her writings. It is interesting that a 2005 US-wide survey revealed that many (under 40) pastors across all denominations cited her as one of their most influential authors. As presenter Mark Howard relates in one of his SOP seminars,[1] even an independent non-SDA Lawyer who was hired in the 1980's to look into the common charge against her of plagiarism, not only most objectively and factually cleared her of that charge, but also gave a quite poignant testimony of how the copious reading he had done of her writings for that legal task had actually Spiritually “moved” him!!
[1] I can’t relocate the exact one and its audio/video link from the listing provided in here
I know there is much to go through and read on my blog, so perhaps these specific links to topics which are most pertinent to the related raised issue(s) here could be of previewing convenience (and also time-saving wise) for you.
To give you a little bit of pertinent contextualization background to my blog work/writing: The foundation of my ministering life since 1997 has always involved trying to figure out why there was such difference with what SDA teach and believe and also the great promises made to them, and the various non-realizations in their experience and existence, and my deeper research has always found the many places where what we believe, teach and practice are more “traditional” than concrete and transparent truth. I first encountered this pivotal reality in trying to figure out why not all Christians believed our presentation on Daniel’s 70 Week ‘since it was so exact, incontrovertible and clear’ well upon undertaking that research,[1] I quickly saw that behind the facade of our presentation, though my research resulted in showing that our dates were correct, the reasons and proofs of fulfilling events and dates that we were giving we actually full of errors and inaccuracies which most non-SDA’s were aware of...hence their rejection of that key/foundational prophecy. I since have found this to be the case with most of what we thought. {Cf. e.g., here}. I.e., they all needed to be better proven. As EGW said, we were to “improve” the light of our fathers putting what they Biblically discovered on the most possible sure and solid foundation. (1T 262.1) What was “surfacly” acceptable in the days of EGW is no longer so in our more Biblical Scholarship advanced days. That I why focus in exegetically proving how the various “extra-Biblical” that EGW had were actually always exegetically supported in the Bible.
[1] See the “Biblical Interpretation” (starting from the summary): here}
[cont’d]
[cont’d]
Delete[Note: The following section was subsequently expanded and reposted in this post at Note #12
Now, to this important issue about the 1904 Ship/Vessel-Iceberg-“Shaken” vision of EGW. It is recorded in 1SM 205.2-206.3 & SpTB02 55.1-56.3. It is found in the context of a “new movement” trying to be formed by “sophistries” being introduced in the SDA Church then, mainly in regards to John Harvey Kellogg’s teaching that there was no Heavenly Sanctuary and his pantheistic theories. And in that vision, EGW was told to meet those heresies (iceberg) head on. As she also said back in 1897, the Shaking would also come through the introduction of such false theories/teachings in the Church (LDE 177.1). So here she was instructed to not let this occur, but to “Meet it” and so defeat it. The same thing should have been going on in the SDA Church today with now, the many false practices which have been allowed to enter the Church. Again the Church’s teachings are “fundamentally” Biblical, but the Church has many widely accepted practices which certainly are not, and are literally self-hindering the advancement of this Ship. Unlike in EGW’s day where there evidently were many others who sided with Truth against the false theories then, today most of the Church leadership and members either fully endorse those false practices or they are just indifferent to them. That “non-meeting inaction” actually is conversely what results in the Church corporately not being able to survive this Shaking (=5T 210.3-211.2ff) for, like in EGW vision, it would have require strong, fact, powerful and collective/corporate countering action to get through it.
So, from my Bible and SOP studies into this issue, the SDA Vessel here/now is actually quite critically damage and is fatally taking on water. The “Church Militant”, i.e., even the faithful “7000" ones (Rev 11:13) who had taken the battle field has defeated itself as the start of the Ezek 37 actually was depicting. They can however join the ‘distinct’ Church Triumphant(LDE 61-62) , if they actually allow God, and in His way, to both Revive and Reform them.
The SDA Church is indeed not Babylon, and that pointedly is because unlike Babylon, it is not “confused”. It clearly knows what God’s Full Truth is. So it instead is God’s Jerusalem and History has shown that God will not abstain from, even most severely, judging His Jerusalem if it deserves it. (E.g., Jer 6-7; Luke 19:41-44), and even rejected and replaced (e.g., Rev 3:16; LDE 59-61ff; cf. Rev 2:5). As I document in this post EGW herself knew that the SDA Church could become a “sister to fallen Babylon” and even, through socio-economic injustices, like Sodom and Gomorrah (Ezek 16:48-50; Isa 1:8-20) for that is what the present, Eschatological phase of Revelation Babylon (Protestant-controlled America) is also doing.
[cont’d]
[cont’d]
DeleteFinal point: There is a very important Spiritual/Theological point to keep in mind from what God stipulated in Jer 18:1-10. As EGW similarly said ‘all of God’s promises are upon condition of obedience’ (COL 145.1) So whatever God has promised to the SDA Church is not set in stone, indeed, relatedly, the future itself is not set in stone. So God can, and my view and experience is that He has long begun to, replace the ‘indifferently, unzealously non-repentful’ (contra. Rev 3:18) SDA Church, and had long given warnings through the SOP that this could become the actually transpired reality case. (LDE 59-61). That is relatedly why the Second Coming was at least 3 times postponed in the days of EGW...because, as with rebellious Ancient Israel (cf. 15MR 292.3-4) the “conditions of the ground” did not warrant the fulfillment the many, and quite specific promises made to that generation. The same Divine conditional principle still applies today. (Jer 18:9-10)
Sorry for the length of this email. It is just that this pivotal is quite involved and I would not to it justice by not summarily presenting it in as much of its substantiating/validating details as possible. Of course, do see my blog post for much more.
May God guide your studies,
Likewise, your Brother in Christ,
[NJK]